Why the Pentagon Wants 240X More

Its autonomous-warfare office got $226 million last year. The new request is $54.6 billion.

It’s the Battle of Agincourt on October 25, 1415.

Henry V of England wasn’t one to watch his men from a hilltop.

He swung his sword in the mud alongside them.

Overhead, thousands of English arrows rained down on France's heavily armored knights.

Cheap weapons fired by commoners crushed some of the most expensive soldiers in Europe.

During the fighting, an axe struck Henry's helmet and damaged his crown.

Back then, leaders had skin in the game.

But look up.

The future was whizzing overhead.

The Distance of War Widens

Over the centuries, generals moved behind the lines. Then off to headquarters far beyond the battlefields.

Pilots flew at 30,000 feet. Drone operators now work in trailers thousands of miles away.

Today, computer-vision models can recognize targets, track their movements, and guide autonomous drones toward them.

Software on one side. A human on the other.

There's one more potential human in the kill chain, too.

You. The potential shareholder, investing in the companies behind this technology using an app on your phone.

So it goes.

My grandfather was a Marine who fought in the Pacific during World War II. He knew what war cost. He made sure I did, too.

But as a tech investor, I need to understand what's changing, and who's being paid to build it.

This is the first of four issues about how computer vision and AI will change warfare.

Today, we'll start in the air.

After that, we'll cover China’s machine-gun robot wolves…

UAPs emerging from the sea…

And finally humanoid robot super soldiers.

Agincourt, Again

America is protected, in part, by two enormous oceans.

Poland, Taiwan, and Israel don't have that luxury.

Oceans don't stop missiles or drones, but they make an invasion of the United States extraordinarily difficult.

In January, the Pentagon released its 2026 National Defense Strategy.

The new U.S. strategy prioritizes defending America and the Western Hemisphere as well as deterring China in the Pacific...

And requiring old allies to take on more of their own defense.

It also includes rebuilding U.S. weapons production.

It's not a simple withdrawal from the world. It's a change in who carries the burden.

Consider the flashpoints: Russia and Ukraine in Eastern Europe. China and Taiwan in the Pacific. Iran, Israel, and their neighbors in the Middle East.

What this means is European, Asian, and Middle Eastern allies may buy more autonomous equipment, right alongside the Pentagon.

On September 30, the War Department announced a new four-star Autonomous Warfare Command, intended to ramp up the use of drones, robotics, and AI across the armed forces.

Its planned launch is October 2027.

The interim project has a familiar name…

Project Agincourt

The Pentagon's autonomous-warfare office received roughly $226 million in fiscal 2026.

Its fiscal 2027 request jumped to $54.6 billion. That's 240X!

Only about $1 billion is in the regular budget. The other $53.6 billion depends on additional legislation.

But given the evolution of technology, it's not a question of if this much money is allocated...

It's only a question of when.

So, now is the time for investors to build a watchlist of companies that could benefit when that money floods in…

Because some of these stocks are aiming to become the Lockheed Martins, General Dynamics and Northrop Grummans of tomorrow.

Asymmetric Drone Warfare Is Here

On June 1, 2025, Ukraine carried out Operation Spiderweb.

Its intelligence services concealed small drones inside wooden cabins loaded onto trucks and driven deep into Russia.

Then they launched them toward military airfields.

Ukraine said 117 drones participated. Some targets were more than 4,000 kilometers from the front.

Think about the math on a single hit. A $1,000 drone against a $100 million bomber.

That's a 100,000:1 cost-exchange ratio.

Today, both sides use drones for reconnaissance, attack, and strikes on infrastructure.

Electronic jamming has also pushed engineers to give more drones the ability to navigate and track objects autonomously.

That doesn't mean every drone chooses its own targets or fires without a human...

But the direction of the technology emerging from this is clear.

Machines are learning to see and making their own decisions...

Much like a Tesla does driving down the road.

How a Machine Sees

If you've ridden in a Tesla, you've seen how computer vision works on its display: cars, pedestrians, lane markings, traffic lights.

The system starts with cameras taking images over time.

A neural network identifies objects and estimates where they are.

Another part of the software tracks them over time and classifies them.

Tesla Autopilot camera view with boxes drawn around detected cars, lane lines and a stop sign

Source: CarScoops

A detection might say: Person. Confidence: 94%.

In a car, that information may contribute to a braking decision.

On a military drone, the consequences are lethal.

Machine sensors also aren't limited to human eyesight.

Thermal cameras detect heat. LiDAR measures distance. Radar can detect objects in conditions where visible-light cameras struggle.

Sensors can monitor 360 degrees without getting tired.

But they can also fail, be fooled, or misclassify what they see. Fast detection isn't the same thing as sound judgment.

That's why this is an entire industry, not just a camera attached to a drone.

Someone builds the eyes. Someone builds the processors. Someone writes the software.

And someone pays for them.

According to Fortune Business Insights, the global military-drone market is estimated at $22.49 billion in 2026...

And projected to reach $52.31 billion by 2034.

That's an 11.1% annual growth rate.

Three Flying Drone Stocks I'm Watching

AeroVironment (AVAV): An Established Supplier

AeroVironment makes the Switchblade family of loitering munitions, along with reconnaissance drones and other defense systems.

Its newer Switchblade technology includes automated target-recognition capabilities, with human oversight still an important part of its military use.

AeroVironment Switchblade loitering munition in flight over wooded hills

Source: AeroVironment

In its latest quarter, the company reported $480.5 million in revenue, up 6%, and $1.5 billion in funded backlog orders.

Management expects $2.125 billion to $2.225 billion in fiscal 2027 revenue.

Of these three stocks, it has the best financials.

The question is whether larger U.S. purchases and orders from our allies translate into sustained production growth.

Risks include contracts arriving late, manufacturing bottlenecks, and the complexity of acquisitions.

Red Cat (RCAT): The Small-Drone Manufacturer

Red Cat makes the Black Widow, a small surveillance drone chosen for the U.S. Army's Short Range Reconnaissance program.

The company is also gaining overseas customers.

It announced orders involving NATO and Asia-Pacific allies, including Japan, in 2026.

Red Cat small reconnaissance drone hovering under storm clouds

Source: Red Cat

Second-quarter revenue reached $20.2 million, up 527% from the year-earlier quarter.

That sounds spectacular. And it's genuine growth from a tiny base.

Its gross margin was still only 16.1%, so scaling production profitably will be a future challenge.

Red Cat also works with outside AI partners, so its value isn't just in a drone that flies…

It's in a platform that carries increasingly capable perception software.

Safe Pro Group (SPAI): The Software Moonshot

This is the smallest and riskiest of the three.

Safe Pro uses computer vision to examine drone imagery and identify landmines and unexploded ordnance.

Same war. Same cameras. Same object detection.

But instead of finding targets to attack, its software helps find explosives so people can avoid them.

Drone beside a rugged tablet showing aerial imagery with detected landmines pinned on a map

Source: Safe Pro

In August, Safe Pro reported more than $5 million in 2026 AI-related orders.

On October 7, it estimated more than $2.5 million in third-quarter revenue.

Those numbers are tiny. And orders aren't the same as recognized sales.

But a June order supporting the U.S. Army combined Safe Pro's AI analysis system with Red Cat's Black Widow drones.

That gives us something worth following: software sold alongside real military hardware.

The question is whether small contracts grow into repeat licenses and wider deployments.

Waiting for the Money

Three stocks. Three different bets.

AeroVironment (AVAV) has scale and funded orders.

Red Cat (RCAT) has a fast-growing small-drone business and new potential customers.

Safe Pro (SPAI) is trying to turn specialized vision software into recurring defense revenue.

Technology has direction. Step back far enough, and you can predict it.

Farther. Cheaper. More precise. Fewer humans are exposed to the most dangerous tasks.

Henry V swung a sword at Agincourt. The man facing him could swing back.

Six centuries later, the soldier on the ground still has skin in the game.

But the machine watching him from above has none.

Just carbon fiber. Circuits. Silicon. And code.

So it goes.

Next issue: China's robot wolves and other fighting machines on the ground…

Always be prospering,

Harry Seldon
Moonshot Minute

P.S. BREAKING NEWS: Yesterday, Ukraine announced a new milestone in air drone warfare. One of its drones flew a wounded soldier out of a front-line position cut off by mined ground and Russian drones. Ukraine's military calls it the first rescue of its kind. And it was all captured on video.

P.P.S. Here's a screenshot of the current Moonshot Minute Portfolio. I've blurred out the tickers since that information is only for Premium Members, but you can see how we've done so far:

🔓 Premium Content Begins Here 🔒

In today's Premium Section: where every one of our hard-asset positions stands right now, which ones are under review, and what to do in the meantime. If you're not a Premium Member yet, you'll want to join today.

I hope you’ve been paying attention because many of our picks are currently beating the S&P by up to 4-to-1 over the last 12 months.

Most financial newsletters charge $500, $1,000, even $5,000 per year. Why? Because they know they can.

I don’t.

I built my wealth the old-fashioned way, not by selling subscriptions.

That’s why I priced this at $35/month, or $300/year.

Not because it’s low quality, but because I don’t need to charge the typical prices other newsletters charge.

One good trade, idea, or concept could pay for your next decade of subscriptions.

The question isn’t ‘Why is this so cheap?’ The question is, ‘Why would I charge more?’

P.S. If this newsletter were $1,000 per year, you’d have to think about it.

You’d weigh your options. You’d analyze the risk.

But it’s $35 a month.

That’s the price of a bad lunch decision.

And remember, just one good idea could pay for your subscription for a decade.

Recent comments from Premium Members:

Amazing! Moonshot is hands down the best $150 decision I have ever made. Up 64% on TICKER REDACTED (so far). Can't thank you enough for your service, advice, recommendations, insight, and every other positive accolade in the dictionary.

Very respectfully and gratefully,

CK

I’m up 71% in 6 weeks would you recommend adding to this bucket if capital allows?

MS

Hello Double D,

As it happened, I already owned some TICKER REDACTED shares when you recommended the stock. Upon your recommendation, I bought more. All told, I'm up over 70% in a month or two.

I greatly appreciate the detailed discussion you and your team provide for your recommendations.

Thank you.

A happy subscriber,

PK

I finally got some liquidity I could use and bought the stock as well as March 2026 calls yesterday morning (October 2nd) when it was at $17.80.

That is easily the best-timed investment/trade I've ever made, and I have your team's perpetual hard work and research to thank for it.

Thanks again for all the hard work. You and your team push out a lot of solid research, and the effort doesn't go unnoticed.

It is greatly appreciated,

MD

Closing at 24% gain, and enough profits to pay for 2yrs of your newsletter. Thank you for this! I especially appreciate you detailing the rationale behind your picks. As a newer investor it’s important for me to know why just as much as what.

MS

Up 68.87% on TICKER REDACTED to date, great recommendation!

BW

Thanks for the great tip on TICKER REDACTED! I bought, and just eight trading days later, it's up 52% as of this very minute. I'm new to your newsletter, less than two months, but I have found it to be quite soundly researched and a truly invaluable source.

I've been actively investing for many years and have, at one time or another, subscribed to various investment advisors. None have been as useful (nor as affordable!) as the Moonshot Minute.

You, sir, do excellent work and we individual investors much appreciate it.

SD

Up 66%! Thanks.

SB

Kudos and thank you for the TICKER REDACTED recommendation. TICKER REDACTED has been awesome and I do understand/believe this to possibly be only the beginning. I bought 200 shares at $16 and another 100 at $18, the day before the surge started. Again, I am very grateful.

RH

I've only been with you a few weeks now, and overall, my portfolio is up 41%. Couldn't have done it without you, DD. Thanks again.

HJP

I joined your plan about 2 months ago.

TICKER REDACTED was a real hit - and I did fully realize it yesterday for a rise - 141%. Great deal!!

IS

Just wanted to drop you a quick THANK YOU! Been a member for about a week (I wanted to see your picks for the electrical asymmetry) and I picked up some TICKER REDACTED & TICKER REDACTED. I’m already up $1,300.00 so my membership is covered for 5 years in about a week!

Keep up the great work! Again, THANKS! Glad to be a subscriber!

RH