- Moonshot Minute
- Posts
- The World Runs on Dirt
The World Runs on Dirt
The future doesn’t run on code. It runs on what we buried and forgot...
If China stopped exporting neodymium magnets tomorrow, America’s fighter jets, wind turbines, and electric cars would all go silent.
We like to believe the future runs on code. But the truth is far less digital and far more dangerous.
The future runs on dirt. Mined by machines. Refined in factories.
Controlled by nations that never stopped playing by the rules of physical power.
While Silicon Valley worships algorithms, the real kings are digging in the ground.
Mining is the most unpopular boom on the planet.
It’s hated, protested, and buried under regulations. No one wants to see it, smell it, or have it in their backyard.
Yet the world’s appetite for lithium, copper, nickel, and rare earths is growing faster than supply can keep up.
The more we talk about clean energy and high technology, the more we quietly depend on the very industry we claim to despise.
Silicon Valley calls itself an ecosystem, but it grows on a foundation it doesn’t control.
Every data center humming with AI depends on turbines lined with rare-earth magnets.
Every battery that powers an EV begins with minerals pulled from the ground.
Every satellite, chip, and server exists because someone somewhere is willing to dig deep enough to feed the machines we worship.
We built a civilization on glass screens and frictionless apps and convinced ourselves we’d transcended matter.
But the physical world didn’t disappear. It just moved out of sight.
We outsourced the mines, the refineries, and, eventually, the understanding.
The illusion of a weightless economy blinded us to a simple truth: power still belongs to those who command the material base of the world.
We Taught a Generation to Code but Not to Comprehend
For decades, we’ve been running on borrowed knowledge.
We stopped teaching people how the world is made.
How raw ore becomes metal, how metal becomes machines, how machines become wealth.
We taught kids to write code but not to comprehend chemistry.
They can design an app in a dorm room, but they can’t tell you why a magnet spins a turbine or how a battery stores charge.
You can measure the forgetting.
In 1982, the U.S. had 25 accredited mining-engineering programs.
Today, there are 14. Degrees awarded fell roughly 40% between 2016 and 2020.
China graduates about 5,000 mining engineers a year. America graduates 327.
A projected shortage of 130,000 geoscientists looms by the end of this decade as a quarter of the workforce retires.
The pipeline isn’t just thin, it’s broken.
Rare-earth refining is the choke point, and we barely train the chemists who can do it.
China now controls the overwhelming majority of separation and refining capacity, while the West offers “occasional courses.”
We talk about “speed,” yet it takes an average of 29 years in the U.S. to bring a new mine into production.
That’s a full generation between decision and delivery.
Meanwhile, dependence deepens.
Around 96% of the world’s anode capacity and 85% of cathode capacity sit in China.
About 65% of the lithium-ion batteries America imported this year came from China.
Export controls are tightening, not loosening. More rare earths have been added to restricted lists.
New rules now require a license for any product that contains even 0.1% Chinese-sourced rare earths, or that relies on Chinese extraction, refining, magnet production, or recycling technology at any stage.
Every step we took away from the dirt that built our wealth made us more dependent on those who never stopped digging.
We know how to consume, but not how to produce.
We’ve forgotten how to make the things that make everything else.
This is the great forgetting of our age: we traded understanding for convenience and mastery for comfort. And the bill for that amnesia is coming due.
The New Cold War Has Shifted from Nuclear to Elemental.
The competition that defines this century won’t be measured by GDP or GDP growth.
It will be measured in atoms, not ideas.
The great tech-arms race is no longer theoretical.
It’s here, accelerating across every layer of civilization.
While the West debates regulation, China is mass-producing innovation.
It’s not just catching up, it’s closing the gap.
AI, quantum computing, semiconductors, nuclear energy, and space infrastructure are all advancing at breakneck speed, driven by secured materials and relentless execution.
China graduates engineers faster than America graduates opinions.
It’s now ahead in 57 of 64 critical technologies tracked by global think tanks, from drones to new materials to quantum communications.
Its chipmaker roadmaps double compute power annually.
Its scientists are building defect-free arrays of over two thousand atoms, pushing quantum hardware an order of magnitude beyond anyone else.
Its space program launches a hundred missions a year and is preparing to own low-Earth orbit once the ISS retires.
And behind every breakthrough lies the same advantage.
Control of the materials that make it possible.
Lithium, graphite, cobalt, nickel, and tungsten.
Each mined, refined, or processed under one flag.
The country that dominates the supply chain controls the future.
The one that doesn’t is forced to bargain for it.
That’s the battlefield now.
Not ideology.
Not politics.
Physics.
Whoever commands the inputs will dictate the outputs.
You Can’t Stream Without Steel
We convinced ourselves that the modern economy had escaped gravity.
That we could simply digitize our way out of scarcity.
But every cloud has a footprint, and every idea has a cost measured in metal, energy, and time.
The “weightless economy” was always a mirage.
The more digital our lives become, the more physical the world beneath them has to be.
Data centers, AI clusters, and chip foundries are the new factories.
Each consumes staggering amounts of electricity, copper, and cooling water.
Training a single large language model can use more power than 100 American homes consume in a year.
Building the servers to run it requires rare earths, steel, and high-purity quartz.
Global energy demand is already rising 25% faster than projected as AI expands.
By 2030, the data industry could consume nearly a fifth of the world’s electricity. And every kilowatt must come from somewhere.
Turbines, grids, gas turbines, and magnets that circle back to the same scarce resources.
Even “green” technologies aren’t green without mining.
A single electric vehicle requires six times the mineral input of a conventional car. A wind turbine needs 4.5 tons of copper.
Solar panels depend on silver and polysilicon refined with coal. Clean energy still runs on extraction. It just hides the shovels.
The deeper truth is that the digital age didn’t free us from the material world.
It multiplied our dependence on it.
The more virtual we become, the more physical infrastructure we need to sustain the illusion.
Every click, every stream, every AI-generated sentence comes with an unseen cost in kilowatts and minerals.
We live in an age that mistakes abstraction for advancement.
But history doesn’t reward illusions.
It rewards those who can still control what the world is made of.
America Is Quietly Becoming an Owner Again
The new industrial reality is dawning, and for the first time in generations, the U.S. government is becoming an owner again.
Washington has quietly taken equity stakes in companies that anchor America’s material survival.
MP Materials, Lithium Americas, and Trilogy Metals are now partially state-backed through defense and energy programs.
Billions are being funneled into the ground, literally.
The Department of Defense alone is investing $5 billion.
Another $2 billion is going to rebuild the National Defense Stockpile.
And a $5 billion mining fund has been launched with backing from the Development Finance Corporation and Orion Resource Partners.
These are not subsidies. They represent direct ownership.
The U.S. is once again taking seats at the industrial table, not as a regulator but as a shareholder.
It’s a return to strategic capitalism. The kind that built the Arsenal of Democracy and won World War II.
The War Production Board has been reborn for an era of supply-chain warfare.
Apple’s rare-earth deal with MP Materials set a price floor that now serves as a benchmark for the G7.
JPMorgan has pledged more than a trillion dollars toward re-shoring U.S. supply chains.
Sovereign wealth funds from Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and the Emirates are buying stakes in North American refineries and battery plants.
The world’s capital is repositioning for control, not convenience.
Mining, energy, and manufacturing are no longer separate industries.
They’re one continuous system.
A refinery is a data center. A battery plant is a defense asset.
An engineer is a soldier in an economic war fought not with weapons, but with knowledge of how things are made.
The next great industrial powers won’t be those who invent the most apps, but those who can rebuild the physical architecture of civilization.
The world is pivoting from efficiency to resilience, from outsourcing to ownership, from endless consumption to control of supply.
And that control won’t be won by speculation or slogans.
It will be won by those willing to get their hands dirty again: mining, building, refining, producing.
The Window Is Closing
We’re already seeing this new age unfold in the markets.
Inside the Moonshot Minute Portfolio, we’ve been positioned for this supercycle for months, and we continue to do so.
Owning the companies building the real backbone of the next industrial era.
These are not the story stocks or the “AI flavor of the week.”
They’re the ones providing the raw power, minerals, and infrastructure that every other revolution will depend on.
Just last week, we closed a position that was up more than 140% since we recommended it.
We alerted readers to take profits, locking in gains while others were still chasing the move.
Since then, the stock has fallen, but not before Moonshot Minute Premium Members took profits and are now preparing to ride the next wave up.
You don’t need to subscribe to Premium to benefit from what’s happening.
If you simply follow the themes we’ll be exploring in the coming weeks and months, you can position yourself to profit as this supercycle plays out.
But if you want more than the themes, if you want access to the exact recommendations driving the biggest gains in the Moonshot Minute Portfolio, you can join us below.
Right now, the world is still underinvested in the very sectors that will define the next decade.
Global capital still hasn’t caught up.
The mining sector remains chronically underfunded, with Western companies facing a trillion-dollar capex gap just to meet projected demand.
Even with billions now flowing from defense and development agencies, experts estimate the world needs a hundred times more investment to secure the materials it depends on.
Exploration budgets are shrinking, and institutional investors are still treating mining like a niche.
That’s the opportunity.
The window before mainstream capital wakes up.
But that window is closing fast.
Capital is starting to flood in, and those who move early will own the advantage.
This is the new age of ownership. And it’s already begun.
Double D
🔓 Premium Content Begins Here 🔒
In today’s Premium Section, you’ll find the next brand new recommendation we’re putting our money in during this explosive stage of the infrastructure buildout.
I hope you’ve been paying attention because many of our picks are currently beating the S&P by up to 4-to-1 this year.
Most financial newsletters charge $500, $1,000, even $5,000 per year. Why? Because they know they can.
I don’t.
I built my wealth the old-fashioned way, not by selling subscriptions.
That’s why I priced this at $25/month, or $250/year.
Not because it’s low quality, but because I don’t need to charge the typical prices other newsletters charge.
One good trade, idea, or concept could pay for your next decade of subscriptions.
The question isn’t ‘Why is this so cheap?’ The question is, ‘Why would I charge more?’
P.S. If this newsletter were $1,000 per year, you’d have to think about it.
You’d weigh your options. You’d analyze the risk.
But it’s $25 a month.
That’s the price of a bad lunch decision.
And remember, just one good idea could pay for your subscription for a decade.